Review : 2005 Slingshot Fuel

December 28, 2004

{13 comments}

The basic design of the Slingshot fuels has remained the same for the most part, but there's been some nifty improvements to the 2005 range of fuels.

Most notable are better low end and slightly faster turning, along with some minor refinements to the bar which includes a steel post around the depower rope (which prevents chafing on your knuckles), and a very neat kite briefcase. Other improvements include enforced strut closures, reinforced struts, and easy-off pigtails which makes removing your kite lines easier. All these improvements together with the one pump system (a single inflation system) makes the kite a good package.

Last year I was able to test the 11 Fuel, and this year I tested the 9 and 13. Both kites are very similar in all aspects except for the turning speed. The turning speed on the 13 felt a bit slow compared to turning speeds on some of the newer 14's available today, but it never presented itself as a problem. The 9 and 11 is plenty fast in turning speed. The first thing you notice is the smooth but strong delivery in power - the fuels are renowned for their grunt and they have no shortage in power.

I was concerned about the range that one would be able to get out of the 13 since it is quite a powerful kite for a light rider such as myself, but I was able to hold it in 20 - 24 knots on flat water - the same conditions that I could comfortably start using the 9. Although the fuels have plenty of power on tap, it's never overwhelming and once can easily cut the power off if need be. The high end of the kite is more than acceptable - in fact I was very pleased with it. This kite delivers smooth, predictable power in an easy to handle package.

During jumps and transitions one feels a lot of hang time - the kite really just keeps you in the air and it boosts you up quickly too. This makes the kite great for heavier riders - it's got the power to let you hang in the air.

Slingshot gained a huge following in 2004 with the Fuels, and I suspect the same and even better for 2005 - the kite seems to appeal to anyone from beginners to pro riders - some of the worlds best wave riders use these kites - and it is easy to see why. The feedback of the kite is excellent and it's got very consistent power delivery. These characteristics confirm why this is the choice of kite for wave riders and heavier riders.

Gavin Spowart, South African Slingshot importer and team rider, throwing a sick kiteloop (see picture below)

The only thing that we felt lacking was a decent relaunch system like the Recon or a 5th line system. However, there are talks that slingshot will offer a recon-like system at a very affordable price that will allow you to relaunch the kite by collapsing the trailing edge as an update soon. This new system will hit the market soon and can be used to upgrade 2005 Slingshots.

To draw to a conclusion : The 2005 Fuels offer some good improvements and are more refined. They will definitely appeal to wave riders, wake style riders and heavier riders. Lighter riders looking for a powerful kite will also enjoy this kite. Beginners and those looking for a weekend cruising kite will be able to manage just fine, but might find the power overwhelming. If the latter is your style you might want to have a look at the Slingshot Diesels.


13 Comments
Add your own comment to 'Review : 2005 Slingshot Fuel'

1 Ronny 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

I have the Fuel 2005 15 after i checked Best, Causion , F1 and some more kites and its a killer kite just press on gas and ride stable and fast and high I try it on 14-17k wind waiting for stronger winds...

2 mario 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

I'm mario,
i write from italy.
What do you suggest for a man of 75 kg that go in kite from 12 to 30 knots??
!7/13/) or 15/11/ and a 7m...
Please i have doubt that 17 is too big and doesn't go upwind easly... i don't like the 17 of the last year in light wind...until 15 knot the kite doesn't pull like a 17 then when the wind blow so i loved.
So i'm confuse i have a doubt that the 15 doesn't pull for light wind.
Please help me.
I use a board like 130X38

3 Lorenzo 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

Do you know if its true that some of the early released fuel 2004 leaked?
somebody is trying to sell me one and i want to be sure it is not one of those. thanks

4 maranga 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

aaaa mariooooo, vatene a pijala ar culo

5 maranga 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

aaaa mariooooo, vatene a pijala ar culo

6 Ric 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

I saw people saying the 17m doesnt go upwind easily. Its very hard to do it. A guy said its a “downwind machine” on a forum. Is it thru?! What do u say about it? I have a 13m and love it. I am thinking to buy a 17 and will buy a 9 too. Sorry because of my bad english. Thanks

7 spowy 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

Hey Marcelo ,

I have emailed you a PDF file on the new Deisel .

Regards gavin

8 marcelo 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

What about the slingshot Diesel ? is it also a good kite ? I've been trying to save money to buy my first kite and now that almost have all the money I'm confused on how to pick the best kite for me !!! I've been reading the articles at ikiteboarding.com and they have been pretty helpful thank you all.

9 Nir 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

Marcelo - Forget about the Diesel, it's a very good kite but not as close to be good as the Fuel.

It's worth the extra dollars, if you're a beginner don't worry - the Fuel would be just fine for you from your first day in the sport until the highest levels.

Go for the Fuel!

10 Gee 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

Between my boyfriend and myself we have 3 2004 Fuels (7m, 9m & 11m) and a 2005 Fuel (7m) and absolutely love them! We are at different levels and I have never felt safer and had more fun learning while his kiting has jumped a huge level since switching from X3's to fuels. We both fall into the light weight rider catagory and there is no problem - just find the right size split for your weight and play with the settings. The 2005 Fuels have more grunt than the 2004, so if you want to hold more wind, try the 2004's on the slower settings. The only complaints we have are that the 2005 bag is awful - what were you guys thinking?! Bring back the 2004 style! Oh yeah and the grip on the 2004 bar is also much softer on the hands - other than that the kites are pretty much similar.

Was wondering if Slingshot have anything smaller than the 7m? Have heard that the Diesel 7m holds more wind than the Fuel but is faster turning - anyone have any comments? Any chance of a 5m in the range? The old GTO's went smaller and the only option for a lot of girls is the Cabrihna's?

11 Optionryder 9/25/2005 8:32:06 AM

Definently buying one of these as soon as I get the money. Gotta drop my 2001 wipika soon, baby's about to become a fossil.

12 Fred 12/11/2005 11:44:15 PM

Hey. I'm pretty new to the sport and seriously considering a Fuel, however I havne't found any good resources for sizing me up for one. I'm from Chicago, so there usually isn't a huge amount of wind. Seems to be around 8-14 on good days. I'm 6'2 (188cm), and weigh about 155. The main problem here is that since i'm new to the sport, I'm not willing to invest in a whole quiver, is there one size that will cover me in most situations? Thanks alot fot the help.

13 slingshot fuel junkie 1/24/2009 8:08:14 AM

ive flown the 2006 fuel for two years and I think the information that is given here is really a good reflection of what the fuel really is. In short the slingshot fuel is:
- strong
- powerfull
- 4 line kite (preferably)

but it is heavy due to the robust materials and therefore it is not the perfect kite for lightwinds.. and nowadays the kites they produce are strong enough and are much more light! so that was the last slingshot ive flown and will ever fly.

Leave a Comment